Citizens for Safe Technology
Empowering the public to protect children
and nature from unsafe wireless technologies.
Letters/Initiatives - Health
HEALTH LETTERS and INITIATIVES: INTRODUCTION to TOPIC Models, Springboards, Ideas
To streamline your search, anywhere on the website, for a specific topic, word or phrase, please use the white search bar located under the Action Kits below.
Looking for a specific topic or a past article? Search for it below:
Addressed to Medical Professionals. Useful to all. Updated November 17, 2013
The following package is for those who wish to approach their doctors with information regarding the possible health risks from non-thermal microwave radiation. It contains links organized into specific health effect categories. These links can be printed out according to personal areas of need or concern, and used to start a dialogue with doctors who may not as yet have associated certain health conditions with EMF or RF exposure.
The introductory letter on pages 1 and 2 contains a link to the entire list, and may be useful to your doctor as a reference tool.
"Dear Medical Professional:
"Your patient has asked us for support in providing you with information regarding the possible health risks from non-thermal microwave radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation, recently reclassified by the WHO/IARC as a Class 2B, possible human carcinogen.
"This WHO risk category also includes lead, DDT, chloroform, and dioxane, and is relevant to all wireless devices emitting radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, including cordless phones, cell phones, IPads, Wi-Fi routers, wireless games, baby monitors, and smart meters . . .
"Many doctors have already given medical advice to their patients by way of a medical letter or note on a prescription form stating that the patient should avoid, for medical reasons, living in a residence or residential complex at which a wireless meter is operating in order to maintain their health or avoid aggravating a medical condition. This medical advice stating the health condition and advising the patient that they should avoid ongoing exposure to wireless radiofrequency and smart meter emissions will allow your patient to participate in the Human Rights Action currently underway. We are hopeful that the individual's right to protect their health as advised by their medical doctor will be upheld by the Human Rights Tribunal, and this forced exposure within their own home to undesirable microwave radiofrequency emissions will be replaced with reasonable and respectful accommodation by BC Hydro . . . "
Information categories contained in this package:
Recommendations Regarding EMR Exposure - American Academy of Environmental Medicine Recommendations Regarding Electromagnetic and Radiofrequency Exposure - Submitted by:Amy L. Dean, DO and William J. Rea, MD
" . . . Because Smart Meters produce Radiofrequency emissions, it is recommended that patients with the above conditions and disabilities be accommodated to protect their health. The AAEM recommends: that no Smart Meters be on these patients' homes, that Smart Meters be removed within a reasonable distance of patients' homes depending on the patients' perception and/or symptoms, and that no collection meters be placed near patients' homes depending on patients' perception and/or symptoms . . . .
RELATED: AAEM Calls for Immediate Caution regarding Smart Meter Installation
Letter to City Councils
The EMF debate changes: Laboratory proof that low powered electromagnetic fields do effect human metabolism
"The implementation of Hydro Quebec's Smart Meter program has lead to a lot of citizen resistance and heated debates over complex scientific issues. Basically the question is should society implement a Precautionary Principle with respect to this technology or continue to allow unrestrained use of wireless technologies under the umbrella of Health Canada's position that non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation has no effect on human health.
"I would like to share with you why I believe that in the light of some recent research, the foundation of this debate has changed. . . .
"The following document was prepared to support the municipality of Lachine, Quebec in their demand for a moratorium on the installation of Smart Meters by Hydro Quebec. Considering the importance of this information, I invite everyone to freely share this document with their own municipal authorities. . .
"Why focus on municipalities? Because they are the one layer of government the closest to the population and people tend to actually have a voice in many municipal issues.
Hydro Quebec's Smart Meter Program The Precautionary Principle with respect to EMF radiation
Letter to City Councils
American Academy of Environmental Medicine
" . . .The peer reviewed, scientific literature demonstrates the correlation between EMF/RF exposure and neurological, cardiac, and pulmonary disease as well as reproductive disorders, immune dysfunction, cancer and other health conditions. The evidence is irrefutable. Despite this research, claims have been made that studies correlating smart meter emissions with adverse health effects do not exist.
"The AAEM has received a case series submitted by Dr. Federica Lamech, MBBS, Self-Reporting of Symptom Development from Exposure to Wireless Smart Meters' Radiofrequency Fields in Victoria. AAEM supports this research. It is a well documented 92 case series that is scientifically valid. It clearly demonstrates adverse health effects in the human population from smart meter emissions. . .
SECOND Submission to Royal Society of Canada - scientific literature on wireless radiation
Cover letter and 45 page scientific literature report of Margaret Friesen M.Sc. to the Royal Society of Canada's Expert Panel reviewing Safety Code 6.
4 November 2013
Dr. Paul Demers, Chair of the Royal Society of Canada's Expert Panel Reviewing Safety Code 6
c/o Russel MacDonald at email@example.com
Please accept the accompanying report Selected list of scientific and other literature on wireless radiation, including radiofrequency and microwave radiation, for a full evaluation of biological effects by the Royal Society of Canada's Expert Panel reviewing Safety Code 6. as my submission further to my presentation by video-conference on Oct. 28th.
My report contains three main lists of references that I believe will be helpful to the Panel in conducting their review: 1) 2009 to the present, 2) 1999 to the end of 2008, not in the McLean 2009 report and 3) 2008 and later, not in the Royal Society's 1999 report. My lists are incomplete and I plan to provide a supplemental list in a few weeks.
Many of the publications provide a scientific basis to conclude that the re can be harm due to non-thermal exposure to non-ionizing radiation. I believe, and I hope the Panel will agree, that there is enough evidence that a precautionary approach be implemented immediately, particularly with regard to children and those who conceive children. Special attention should be paid to the literature on heart effects, a common symptom reported by people with electrosensitivity. Also, particular note should be made to effects on the eye (see page 12 of the RSC 1999 report).
Although there is a large volume of literature to cover, I hope you will read the primary literature and not rely solely on reviews, or reviews of reviews. Speaking with leading researchers in the field such as Dr. Paul Heroux at McGill University, Dr. Belpomme in France and Dr. David Carpenter in the US will provide a real look at emerging relevant science . Please also seek out clinicians who see people who report adverse symptoms from exposure to wireless radiation (Dr. Bray and others at the Toronto Women's College clinic, Dr. Fox or Dr. Joffres in Nova Scotia and Dr. Genuis in Alberta).
Please do your utmost to ensure that the evidence showing harm is given the weight it merits, and recommend revising Safety Code 6 giving full consideration to non-thermal effects on human health. I would be glad to discuss this further and to respond to any questions regarding my oral or written submission.
submission to Royal Society of Canada - Planetary Association for Clean Energy (PACE)
Limits of Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Energy in the Frequency Range from 3 kHz to 300 GHz
Safety Code Six Expert Panel Review - October 28, 2013
Safety Code Six Expert Panel Review - October 28, 2013
(UPDATED OCTOBER 30) LINKS to submissions to Royal Society of Canada, October 28, 2013
Submission to Royal Society of Canada - October 28, 2013
One time donation: Click the donate button below and follow the instructions on the screen.
Monthly donation: If you wish to contribute every month, please select the amount from the Donation Options list below and click Subscribe. Your contribution will be sent for you every month for the amount you selected.
Citizens for Safe Technology (CST) is funded and supported solely by those who wish to help us. Thank-you for learning, sharing and helping if you can.
Meetings and events on the issue of wireless technologies in homes and communities throughout North America.
Click the button above to sign our online petition to return to hardwired computers in schools.
Click the button above to sign our online petition against Smart Meters in British Columbia.
Citizens For Safe Technology
"Wi-Fi: Is It Safe?"
Citizens for Safe Technology is a not-for-profit educational society made up of parents, grandparents, teachers, business professionals, scientists, politicians and lawyers concerned about the exponential increase in public exposure to harmful wireless technologies.
We believe a profound urgency exists to protect the unsuspecting public, especially children, youth and pregnant mothers from unsafe wireless technologies.
The content of the Citizens for Safe Technology website is provided for information purposes only. Information is subject to change without prior notice. Every effort has been taken to ensure that the information on this website is accurate, but no guarantees can be made.
Neither Citizens for Safe Technology nor its authors are liable for damages resulting from the use of information obtained from this site. The authors are not responsible for any contents linked or referred to from this website or any damages resulting from information on those sites.
The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the information on this site lies with the reader.